لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life as well as the importance of maintaining regulation and order in society.
Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC gives with the death penalty as the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender could possibly be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
The mentioned recovery may be used, on the most, for corroboration of the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be described as a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of event. The claimed memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as practically nothing was discovered because of such pointation. The place of event as well as the place of throwing the dead body were already inside the knowledge of witnesses ahead of their pointation because of the petitioners. Reliance can also be placed on case law titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It's also a perfectly-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision along with the statutes.[four]
Electronic and paper court records retained on the court site may be viewed within the courthouse for free, however there is actually a rate of 10 cents for every page to print from a public access terminal.
The law as founded in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Please note, In case you are seeking a payment exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court click here directly.
Therefore, it had been held that the right to your healthy environment was part in the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and 14 on the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all facets of human existence, all these types of amenities and services that a person is entitled to enjoy with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to your person, by doing an act which inside the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently harmful that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death in the this kind of person, is claimed to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
13309-B of 2010 to get weak types of evidence plus the evidentiary value whereof would be observed in the time on the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Therefore, confirmed custody in the petitioner in jail is not likely to serve any advantageous purpose at this stage.”
The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and prospective hazard to local residents. Eventually, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, although observing the general pattern supports that electromagnetic fields have damaging effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out within the 1992 Rio Declaration around the Environment and Enhancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby the lack of full scientific certainty should not be used as being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.